A few of our friends here appear to be staying away. We miss you. Yes, I dissed Hillary Clinton and her failed campaign. But that’s just me. Surely you know I’ve never meant this to be a home for views that reflect only my own. Anyone can contribute a post, or publish a comment from any point of view. All I ask is that I be allowed to do the same without assumptions that my view rules the site. So even if you don’t like what some say here come on back and share. We miss you.
It was my first paying job in presidential politics, going to Alabama for John Glenn. 1984. We got his only double digits in that primary campaign season. Would have won the state, but Gary Hart’s New Hampshire success made him the only anybody-but-Mondale candidate.
His wife Anna (he always called her Annie) was among the finest humans I ever met in politics (other than Elizabeth Edwards and Rosalynn Carter).
I’ll always remember the day we scheduled “Annie” to spend the day campaigning for her husband traveling around Alabama in a motor home. He kissed her good bye that morning and told me, “You get her back safely to me tonight.”
That I did, and I later learned that was the only time in the campaign they had been apart so long. When they reunited that evening you could feel the love.
Thinking of “Annie” tonight.
I am saddened these are the days to send off Joe Biden. Tributes to him yesterday in the Senate, from both parties, were moving. But still, I wish he had gone further. The guy is real, approachable and authentic amidst so many phonies. Many times I’ve experienced memorable encounters with Biden, from covering his presidential campaigns to hanging out in airports, and I cherish them all. Like the day our flight was horribly delayed and I took a shot at sitting next to him to chat.
We talked about the Supreme Court, and his pivotal role in the Robert Bork hearings, which I had covered. He said, “We dodged a bullet on that one, but took so many more.”
Yep, he got that right.
The Clinton/DNC mafia forced him aside in 2016, a sad and disgusting truth that will someday be told.
Those arrogant fools ridiculed hum as a joke. But the joke is on them.
Would Joe Biden have lost the entire Rust Belt?
By Whskyjack, a Trail Mix Contributor
I clipped a few paragraphs from an article by Lawrence Lessig, it is a long piece but well worth the read and just maybe if …………
Lester Lawrence “Larry” Lessig III is an American academic, attorney, and political activist. He is the Roy L. Furman Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and the former director of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard University. Wikipedia
Most people, even Dems, can’t seem to allow themselves to even think about a constitutional challenge to the Electoral College — because they’re convinced our current Electoral College system is embedded in the Constitution. So when someone says, “what about one person, one vote,” they respond, “it’s the Constitution that creates this inequality—just as with the Senate—and the Court is not going to overrule the Constitution.”
Yet that response misses a critical point.
Yes, the Constitution creates an inequality because of the way it allocates electoral college votes. A state like Wyoming, for example, gets 3 electoral votes with a population of less than 600,000, while California gets 55 electoral votes with a population of more than 37 million. Thus, while California has a population that is 66x Wyoming, but only gets 18x the electoral college votes.
But the real inequality of the electoral college is created by the “winner take all” (WTA) rule for allocating electoral votes. WTA says that the person who wins the popular votes gets all the electoral college votes for that state. Every state (except Maine and Nebraska) allocates its electors based on WTA. But that system for allocating electoral votes is not mandated by the Constitution. It is created by the states. And so that raises what should be an obvious and much more fiercely contested question—why isn’t WTA being challenged by the Democrats in this election?
The 2000 election was the first time in US history that the candidate losing the popular vote won a majority of the Electoral College outright. Now that has happened again in 2016. The major contributing factors to this outcome are the winner-take-all system of allocating Electors coupled with the growing concentration of the US population in a handful of States. These factors create a substantial risk that a candidate that loses the popular vote would win the Electoral College outright even if the small state advantage did not exist. This election is a clear example of that risk. To be clear, Trump did not win the Electoral College because of a constitutional design, he won because of the winner-take-all system of allocating Electors and that critical legal factor is strictly a function of State law…………..
In summary, a winner-take-all system of allocating Electors by the states denies the minority of voters within each state any representation whatsoever within the Electoral College and ultimately in the case of the 2000 and 2016 elections, denies the plurality of voters nationwide their choice for President under circumstances in which the constitutionally established small state advantage made part of the Electoral College wouldnot. This is neither a reasonable nor a rational result in a representative democracy. This result was dictated by the winner-take-all method of allocating Electors used by the states. It is this state law method of allocating Electors that is an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment and its bedrock principle of one man one vote.
We’re upgrading some things around here for better security, functionality and, what the heck, some change for the heck of change. A new WordPress platform, new blog theme, and some other stuff. As always these things are a work in progress. Glitches expected. Fixes to be made. Let me know if your have problems: email@example.com
to honor those who stood up by standing at standing rock
And how few by deceit. — Noel Coward
By Blue Bronc, a Trail Mix Contributor
Something occurred last year about this time that set me curious and with a questioning of what is going on in this world. It was repeated this last Friday in another business exchange. I do not know if it is my generation and those earlier which caused the disruption to my value system. Or if it was my early religious experiences, which also affected me.
I drive a truck with a diesel engine. If you have one you understand the need to replace two batteries, not just one. As winter was approaching, or perhaps was knocking, it was time to replace batteries which barely made it through summer. I drove over to one of the big box discount stores and purchased two new batteries. Asked for the used batteries I said those were still in the truck and I would bring them back the next day. That was fine and I was not charged a battery fee.
As promised I showed up the next day with the two used batteries. As they were being transferred to a storage rack a comment came to me: “Thank you for your honesty.”
At first I thought nothing of it. I was happy not to have two nasty old batteries around. And more important I gave my word to bring them back.
But over the hours of the afternoon and since I thought of that comment and wondered why the clerk felt he needed to say that. Was theft that rampant? Were the customers of this store, and perhaps all stores, dishonest? It has been bothersome. A nit in the drawers.
A singular statement until Friday.
I placed an order with a gigantic online retailer last Saturday for a new mouse and a murder mystery novel. The mouse was to be delivered on Monday. Excellent. Monday, no delivery. Okay, a mistake was made but of minor consequences. Tuesday, delivery schedule was to bring a mouse and book to my door by eight p.m. Tuesday, no delivery. Wednesday, the delivery schedule was to be by eight p.m. No delivery after eight p.m. So I called the retailer and they could not get anyone at the delivery office to answer the phone. I cancelled the order.
Thursday morning there was a box in my door. It arrived, but was no longer mine. I did not have time to deal with it that day but I did on Friday. I called and it took a while for the customer service to understand that the articles were delivered and I would pay for them rather than send them back. In fact about thirty minutes of customer service trying to figure out how to accomplish such a feat as reopen the order and pay for it again.
Several times during this ordeal I was told by the CS person “Thank you for your honesty”. What? I had no idea that agreeing to buy what had been bought, cancelled and now paid for again required honesty. I do not understand. I find it hard to comprehend that honesty was what I did.
Put these two experiences together, along with the current discourse of our country from the election and I am still unable to come to any valid conclusion.
“Thank you for your honesty”. A phrase that is so unusual outside of someone returning a wallet without taking the contents, that it catches with me. “Thank you for returning these batteries” is what I expected first. The second time I expected “thank you for your order (even if it is the second time)”.
And now we have someone who might be the most dishonest person ever elected to be president leading by example. I do fear for these United States.
More Posts by Blue Bronc
By Jace, a Trail Mix Contributor
More music of the season. A marvelous setting of Psalm 150. Enjoy the music, enjoy the season, but most of all enjoy your day!
More Posts by Jace
Hillary Clinton campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri: “One of my proudest moments with [Hillary Clinton] is her standing up with courage and with clarity in Steve Bannon’s own words and Donald Trump’s own words the platform that they gave to white supremacists, white nationalists. And it is a very, very important moment in our history as a country and I think as his presidency goes forward I am going to be very glad to be part of the campaign that tried to stop this.”
Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway: “We flipped over 200 counties that President Obama won, and Donald Trump just won. You think that’s because of what you said, or that people aren’t ready for a woman president? Really? How come it’s just Hillary Clinton? She doesn’t connect with people. How about they have nothing in common with her? How about you had no economic message?”